Talk:APU Triangle: Difference between revisions

From NESdev Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary
(response in thread)
 
Line 4: Line 4:


As per my comment in this thread: [http://forums.nesdev.org/viewtopic.php?f=3&t=19191], I believe the $4008 "Side effects" to be wrong - As best I can figure, if you actually code $4008 to set the reload flag, it causes the triangle to behave incorrectly (see thread). But since it seems to have been very explicitly added recently, I figured I'd ask about it here instead of just changing it. It seems to be incorrect? [[User:Drilian|Drilian]] ([[User talk:Drilian|talk]]) 00:09, 12 August 2019 (PDT)
As per my comment in this thread: [http://forums.nesdev.org/viewtopic.php?f=3&t=19191], I believe the $4008 "Side effects" to be wrong - As best I can figure, if you actually code $4008 to set the reload flag, it causes the triangle to behave incorrectly (see thread). But since it seems to have been very explicitly added recently, I figured I'd ask about it here instead of just changing it. It seems to be incorrect? [[User:Drilian|Drilian]] ([[User talk:Drilian|talk]]) 00:09, 12 August 2019 (PDT)
:Responded [https://forums.nesdev.org/viewtopic.php?p=241700#p241700 in that thread]. - [[User:Rainwarrior|Rainwarrior]] ([[User talk:Rainwarrior|talk]]) 03:30, 12 August 2019 (MDT)

Latest revision as of 09:30, 12 August 2019

I'm fairly sure triangle can be silenced by writing $00 to $4008, too. Any value with the low 7 bits at 0 will silence the channel, regardless of the value of bit 7.Bregalad (talk) 02:18, 20 March 2019 (MDT)

Yes you can write $00. The consequence though is that the length counter goes active and will eventually expire, requiring an additional reload of $400B to un-silence the channel later. - Rainwarrior (talk) 07:24, 20 March 2019 (MDT)

As per my comment in this thread: [1], I believe the $4008 "Side effects" to be wrong - As best I can figure, if you actually code $4008 to set the reload flag, it causes the triangle to behave incorrectly (see thread). But since it seems to have been very explicitly added recently, I figured I'd ask about it here instead of just changing it. It seems to be incorrect? Drilian (talk) 00:09, 12 August 2019 (PDT)

Responded in that thread. - Rainwarrior (talk) 03:30, 12 August 2019 (MDT)