Talk:Cartridge connector: Difference between revisions

From NESdev Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
m (revert spam)
Line 28: Line 28:
The descriptions on this page of Audio Out and Audio In are relative to the Famicom, not the cartridge, so "Audio Out" means out from the 2A03, and "Audio In" means audio in from the cart. Is that in line with the change you made, Lidnariq? (And if not, perhaps we should revise the descriptions, and/or use a more descriptive naming than In/Out to avoid future confusion.) - [[User:Rainwarrior|Rainwarrior]] ([[User talk:Rainwarrior|talk]]) 21:46, 19 January 2013 (MST)
The descriptions on this page of Audio Out and Audio In are relative to the Famicom, not the cartridge, so "Audio Out" means out from the 2A03, and "Audio In" means audio in from the cart. Is that in line with the change you made, Lidnariq? (And if not, perhaps we should revise the descriptions, and/or use a more descriptive naming than In/Out to avoid future confusion.) - [[User:Rainwarrior|Rainwarrior]] ([[User talk:Rainwarrior|talk]]) 21:46, 19 January 2013 (MST)
: Good point. I changed it because I'd noticed I'd RE'd the SS5B schematic incorrectly due to misunderstanding the names, but I agree that "in" and "out" are insufficiently unambiguous. So now this should be plenty clear.—[[User:Lidnariq|Lidnariq]] ([[User talk:Lidnariq|talk]]) 23:34, 19 January 2013 (MST)
: Good point. I changed it because I'd noticed I'd RE'd the SS5B schematic incorrectly due to misunderstanding the names, but I agree that "in" and "out" are insufficiently unambiguous. So now this should be plenty clear.—[[User:Lidnariq|Lidnariq]] ([[User talk:Lidnariq|talk]]) 23:34, 19 January 2013 (MST)
== An ISO Certification ==
ISO Certification Consultants, ISO Certification Consultants Dubai uae Abu Dhabi, ISO 9001, ISO 27001, ISO 20000, ISO 14001, OHSAS 18001,ISO 17025, HACCP, ISO 22000, ISO 50001, EnMS, ISO Training Services, Management System Certification, ISO Consultant Dubai, ISO Certification Services in Dubai, ISO Consultants in Abu Dhabi, ISO Consultants in UAE, ISO 9001 Certification in Dubai, ISO Certification in Abu Dhabi, ISO Training Dubai, ISO 9001 Consultants in UAE, ISO 50001 Consultants in UAE, ISO 27001 Consultants in UAE, ISO 20000 Consultants in Dubai, ISO 22301 Certification in Dubai, ISO Certification Consultants in UAE, ISO 17025 Consultants UAE
KAYZED Consultants: Assuring best of Quality Management System, Quality Assurance Services, and Food Safety Systems

Revision as of 06:10, 19 March 2014

Orientation

I'm a little confused about this. Why does the pin orientation for the NES appear to be viewed from underneath the connector? Wouldn't it make more sense if it was a top-down view like on the famicom diagram? - Rainwarrior 20:45, 26 August 2012 (MDT)

Probably to be consistent with standard pinout numbering, which always goes counterclockwise and has pin 1 as top-left. It's also consistent with the edge on the mainboard. Not the best of reasons... —Lidnariq 20:53, 26 August 2012 (MDT)
It make it very counter-intuitive if you're trying to do something related to Famicom<->NES conversion. I could see it being more useful if you're soldering something to the back of a toploader board, but other than that case I find it really confusing. Would you mind if I reversed it to be consistent with the Famicom version? I could reverse the numbers alongside it, if it's important that they stay the same. - Rainwarrior 21:12, 26 August 2012 (MDT)
Ahh, I see that many Nintendo NES carts are numbered in this way, but I still think it'd be better just to have the numbering proceed upside down. As it is right now you would have to be looking at the card-edge upside down to see the same orientation as this diagram (and the numbers on the board would be upside down as well). - Rainwarrior 21:37, 26 August 2012 (MDT)
The hesitations I have to reordering it is 1- that the parallelism between the Famicom and NES header isn't as obvious and 2- the presented pin order isn't consistent with the industry convention. But these aren't good enough reasons for me to stop you. (But they're good enough for me to not do the edit myself)—Lidnariq 23:21, 26 August 2012 (MDT)
Okay, I have reversed the NES diagram. The numbering in both diagrams is consistent with the numbering on Nintendo PCBs, so I made no changes to that. I don't know what industry convention is for numbering pins of a card-edge connector, but I don't think it's relevant here, since Nintendo provided their own numbering on their PCBs (and if one of them meets the industry standard, the other is backwards). I added some notes about the orientation and how the two systems relate to each other. - Rainwarrior 10:47, 27 August 2012 (MDT)
What is the industry convention for card edges? I'm used to pin orders being counter-clockwise around a chip from the top. Is it different for a card edge? The Nintendo boards are numbered left to right on one side, right to left on the other, rather than clockwise or counterclockwise around the board. - Rainwarrior 12:41, 27 August 2012 (MDT)
I meant "same as IC convention", but I think industry convention for card edges is (letter)(pin number) in line, without any rotation. e.g. ISA has A01-A31, B01-B31, C01-C18, D01-D18, arranged as
B01 B02 … B30 B31   D01 … D18
A01 A02 … A30 A31   C01 … C18
Lidnariq 12:52, 27 August 2012 (MDT)

CIRAM A10

If you connect CIRAM A10 to PA6 (the adjacent pin), will this work for a fixed single page mirroring (it won't actually be contiguous in RAM but as far as I can tell it could work)? If so, do any known cartridges do this? --Zzo38 14:44, 23 September 2012 (MDT)

Audio In vs Out

Just curious about this change: http://wiki.nesdev.org/w/index.php?title=Cartridge_connector&diff=5344&oldid=4339

The descriptions on this page of Audio Out and Audio In are relative to the Famicom, not the cartridge, so "Audio Out" means out from the 2A03, and "Audio In" means audio in from the cart. Is that in line with the change you made, Lidnariq? (And if not, perhaps we should revise the descriptions, and/or use a more descriptive naming than In/Out to avoid future confusion.) - Rainwarrior (talk) 21:46, 19 January 2013 (MST)

Good point. I changed it because I'd noticed I'd RE'd the SS5B schematic incorrectly due to misunderstanding the names, but I agree that "in" and "out" are insufficiently unambiguous. So now this should be plenty clear.—Lidnariq (talk) 23:34, 19 January 2013 (MST)