User talk:Abuse filter: Difference between revisions

From NESdev Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 3: Line 3:
:: Are you sure? They seem to be constructive edits. [[Special:Contributions/79.185.223.15|79.185.223.15]] 15:06, 15 September 2021 (UTC)
:: Are you sure? They seem to be constructive edits. [[Special:Contributions/79.185.223.15|79.185.223.15]] 15:06, 15 September 2021 (UTC)
::: How would you know whether they were constructive, given that they're all being blocked for attempting to add URLs? --[[User:Quietust|Quietust]] ([[User talk:Quietust|talk]]) 15:47, 15 September 2021 (UTC)
::: How would you know whether they were constructive, given that they're all being blocked for attempting to add URLs? --[[User:Quietust|Quietust]] ([[User talk:Quietust|talk]]) 15:47, 15 September 2021 (UTC)
::::This wiki appears to be quite popular as seen by the amount of users wanting to link to external reliable sources. [[Special:Contributions/79.185.223.15|79.185.223.15]] 19:27, 15 September 2021 (UTC)

Revision as of 19:27, 15 September 2021

The Abuse filter blocks extremely way too many false positives, as seen in Special:RecentChanges. Piotr Grochowski (talk) 04:40, 14 September 2021 (UTC)

They are NOT false positives. Every single one is attempted spam, because someone cracked the CAPTCHA and we don't have permissions to update it. —Lidnariq (talk) 18:04, 14 September 2021 (UTC)
Are you sure? They seem to be constructive edits. 79.185.223.15 15:06, 15 September 2021 (UTC)
How would you know whether they were constructive, given that they're all being blocked for attempting to add URLs? --Quietust (talk) 15:47, 15 September 2021 (UTC)
This wiki appears to be quite popular as seen by the amount of users wanting to link to external reliable sources. 79.185.223.15 19:27, 15 September 2021 (UTC)