User talk:Abuse filter: Difference between revisions
From NESdev Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
: They are NOT false positives. Every single one is attempted spam, because someone cracked the CAPTCHA and we don't have permissions to update it. —[[User:Lidnariq|Lidnariq]] ([[User talk:Lidnariq|talk]]) 18:04, 14 September 2021 (UTC) | : They are NOT false positives. Every single one is attempted spam, because someone cracked the CAPTCHA and we don't have permissions to update it. —[[User:Lidnariq|Lidnariq]] ([[User talk:Lidnariq|talk]]) 18:04, 14 September 2021 (UTC) | ||
:: Are you sure? They seem to be constructive edits. [[Special:Contributions/79.185.223.15|79.185.223.15]] 15:06, 15 September 2021 (UTC) | :: Are you sure? They seem to be constructive edits. [[Special:Contributions/79.185.223.15|79.185.223.15]] 15:06, 15 September 2021 (UTC) | ||
::: How would you know whether they were constructive, given that they're all being blocked for attempting to add URLs? --[[User:Quietust|Quietust]] ([[User talk:Quietust|talk]]) 15:47, 15 September 2021 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 15:47, 15 September 2021
The Abuse filter blocks extremely way too many false positives, as seen in Special:RecentChanges. Piotr Grochowski (talk) 04:40, 14 September 2021 (UTC)
- They are NOT false positives. Every single one is attempted spam, because someone cracked the CAPTCHA and we don't have permissions to update it. —Lidnariq (talk) 18:04, 14 September 2021 (UTC)
- Are you sure? They seem to be constructive edits. 79.185.223.15 15:06, 15 September 2021 (UTC)
