User talk:Zzo38/Metadata INI: Difference between revisions
From NESdev Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
By "effectively public domain", did you mean to include all-permissive licenses requiring attribution, such as the MIT License, New BSD License, and GNU Permissive License? The only practical difference between these and public domain status is that all copies of a work under one of these licenses must retain the copyright notice. --[[User:Tepples|Tepples]] ([[User talk:Tepples|talk]]) 19:00, 18 March 2013 (MDT) | By "effectively public domain", did you mean to include all-permissive licenses requiring attribution, such as the MIT License, New BSD License, and GNU Permissive License? The only practical difference between these and public domain status is that all copies of a work under one of these licenses must retain the copyright notice. --[[User:Tepples|Tepples]] ([[User talk:Tepples|talk]]) 19:00, 18 March 2013 (MDT) | ||
:No, but I do mean CC0 and Unlicense. --[[User:Zzo38|Zzo38]] ([[User talk:Zzo38|talk]]) 18:39, 19 March 2013 (MDT) | :No, but I do mean CC0 and Unlicense (as far as I know, these are "effectively public domain"). However, it might be useful to include those too, such as with something like the Creative Commons permissions tags. --[[User:Zzo38|Zzo38]] ([[User talk:Zzo38|talk]]) 18:39, 19 March 2013 (MDT) | ||
Revision as of 00:40, 20 March 2013
Effectively public domain
By "effectively public domain", did you mean to include all-permissive licenses requiring attribution, such as the MIT License, New BSD License, and GNU Permissive License? The only practical difference between these and public domain status is that all copies of a work under one of these licenses must retain the copyright notice. --Tepples (talk) 19:00, 18 March 2013 (MDT)
