Category talk:Mappers with large PRG RAM: Difference between revisions
From NESdev Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
Rainwarrior (talk | contribs) (>8k should be a reasonable definition) |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
:If you want to make it not vague, I'd actually suggest to define it in the category that anything over 8k is "large". That's a pretty meaningful boundary in terms of NES PRG-RAM. Banking isn't necessarily the qualification (should the FDS RAM adapter be in this category?) - [[User:Rainwarrior|Rainwarrior]] ([[User talk:Rainwarrior|talk]]) 17:16, 21 April 2015 (MDT) | :If you want to make it not vague, I'd actually suggest to define it in the category that anything over 8k is "large". That's a pretty meaningful boundary in terms of NES PRG-RAM. Banking isn't necessarily the qualification (should the FDS RAM adapter be in this category?) - [[User:Rainwarrior|Rainwarrior]] ([[User talk:Rainwarrior|talk]]) 17:16, 21 April 2015 (MDT) | ||
::My point is more that the name of the category itself is vague. The description given on the page is perfectly serviceable. This feels more like it's telling me that such-and-such mappers have Huge Guts. [[User:Myask|Myask]] ([[User talk:Myask|talk]]) 18:38, 21 April 2015 (MDT) | |||
Latest revision as of 00:38, 22 April 2015
Suggest move to "Category:Mappers with bankable PRG RAM" (bank-switchable? Exact word choice uncertain...) but 'large' is vague and the page clearly specifies that it means bank-switchable. Myask (talk) 16:57, 21 April 2015 (MDT)
- If you want to make it not vague, I'd actually suggest to define it in the category that anything over 8k is "large". That's a pretty meaningful boundary in terms of NES PRG-RAM. Banking isn't necessarily the qualification (should the FDS RAM adapter be in this category?) - Rainwarrior (talk) 17:16, 21 April 2015 (MDT)
