Talk:Fixed cycle delay: Difference between revisions

From NESdev Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
Line 5: Line 5:


I'm noticing the wiki has some serious problems trying to diff some of the history on this page. I noticed [http://wiki.nesdev.org/w/index.php?title=Fixed_cycle_delay&curid=1621&diff=12038&oldid=12037 this edit] with the comment "Further tweak code to prefer repeated sequences, because reducing the page size helps fend off MediaWiki crashing". Given the explosive nature of permutations here, maybe it would be better to just implement this as a javascript tool on a webpage, and link it from here? (Would also be nice because you could just dial in constraints, etc.) - [[User:Rainwarrior|Rainwarrior]] ([[User talk:Rainwarrior|talk]]) 21:02, 16 March 2016 (MDT)
I'm noticing the wiki has some serious problems trying to diff some of the history on this page. I noticed [http://wiki.nesdev.org/w/index.php?title=Fixed_cycle_delay&curid=1621&diff=12038&oldid=12037 this edit] with the comment "Further tweak code to prefer repeated sequences, because reducing the page size helps fend off MediaWiki crashing". Given the explosive nature of permutations here, maybe it would be better to just implement this as a javascript tool on a webpage, and link it from here? (Would also be nice because you could just dial in constraints, etc.) - [[User:Rainwarrior|Rainwarrior]] ([[User talk:Rainwarrior|talk]]) 21:02, 16 March 2016 (MDT)
:I'd recommend splitting them by 2-19, 20-100, 100-200, etc. --[[User:Tepples|Tepples]] ([[User talk:Tepples|talk]]) 09:40, 17 March 2016 (MDT)

Revision as of 15:40, 17 March 2016

No requirements missing from most examples?

Shouldn't there be a "no requirements" entry for every example? Isn't that the natural maximum byte size / endpoint for each of these? - Rainwarrior (talk) 20:14, 16 March 2016 (MDT)

Page size problematic? Maybe the wiki sin't the best place for exhaustive permutations...

I'm noticing the wiki has some serious problems trying to diff some of the history on this page. I noticed this edit with the comment "Further tweak code to prefer repeated sequences, because reducing the page size helps fend off MediaWiki crashing". Given the explosive nature of permutations here, maybe it would be better to just implement this as a javascript tool on a webpage, and link it from here? (Would also be nice because you could just dial in constraints, etc.) - Rainwarrior (talk) 21:02, 16 March 2016 (MDT)

I'd recommend splitting them by 2-19, 20-100, 100-200, etc. --Tepples (talk) 09:40, 17 March 2016 (MDT)