Talk:Nestech.txt errata: Difference between revisions
From NESdev Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
(What's even the purpose of this page?) |
m (Tepples moved page Talk:Nestech.txt to Talk:Nestech.txt errata: Clarify the purpose of this document pending whether koitsu decides to let us incorporate the document itself into the wiki as a different way of explaining things) |
||
| (One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
What is even the point of this page? It is an awful mix of a description of a document and an errata of the said document. I'd say if you want to do errata it belongs to the [errata] page, or much better, @Koitsu, update your document to release a new version that fixes the current inaccuracies (it's never too late, and for historical reason, I belive your doccument is great, *much* better than this wiki). | What is even the point of this page? It is an awful mix of a description of a document and an errata of the said document, that is not understandable if you don't have the document below the eyes. I'd say if you want to do errata it belongs to the [errata] page, or much better, @Koitsu, update your document to release a new version that fixes the current inaccuracies (it's never too late, and for historical reason, I belive your doccument is great, *much* better than this wiki). | ||
Describing the document in the wiki could make sense, but then it would make more sense to describe many document in one page, or else the number of page dedicated to document descriptions will grow very large. | Describing the document in the wiki could make sense, but then it would make more sense to describe many document in one page, or else the number of page dedicated to document descriptions will grow very large. | ||
[[User:Bregalad|Bregalad]] ([[User talk:Bregalad|talk]]) 08:15, 27 May 2015 (MDT) | [[User:Bregalad|Bregalad]] ([[User talk:Bregalad|talk]]) 08:15, 27 May 2015 (MDT) | ||
Latest revision as of 23:43, 3 September 2018
What is even the point of this page? It is an awful mix of a description of a document and an errata of the said document, that is not understandable if you don't have the document below the eyes. I'd say if you want to do errata it belongs to the [errata] page, or much better, @Koitsu, update your document to release a new version that fixes the current inaccuracies (it's never too late, and for historical reason, I belive your doccument is great, *much* better than this wiki).
Describing the document in the wiki could make sense, but then it would make more sense to describe many document in one page, or else the number of page dedicated to document descriptions will grow very large. Bregalad (talk) 08:15, 27 May 2015 (MDT)
