Talk:Sprite overflow games: Difference between revisions

From NESdev Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
(Actual question before adding a change to split Commercial to Official or Unofficial)
 
(→‎Splitting Commercial Games: Once there's more than one unlicensed game)
Line 3: Line 3:
I have a question, Is it better to split the Commercial Games between Official and Unofficial Releases?
I have a question, Is it better to split the Commercial Games between Official and Unofficial Releases?
(Example: Bee 52 is an Unlicenced cartridge, so this goes under Unofficial) --[[User:Hamtaro126|Hamtaro126]] ([[User talk:Hamtaro126|talk]]) 14:38, 11 November 2014 (MST)
(Example: Bee 52 is an Unlicenced cartridge, so this goes under Unofficial) --[[User:Hamtaro126|Hamtaro126]] ([[User talk:Hamtaro126|talk]]) 14:38, 11 November 2014 (MST)
:I might consider it once there is more than one unlicensed game in the list. Having more than one unlicensed game in the list may help toward an explanation of how unlicensed games on the whole use it more, less, or in a different manner compared to licensed games. But having only one doesn't accomplish much other than shaming Codemasters for not having the Seal. --[[User:Tepples|Tepples]] ([[User talk:Tepples|talk]]) 15:19, 12 November 2014 (MST)

Revision as of 22:19, 12 November 2014

Splitting Commercial Games

I have a question, Is it better to split the Commercial Games between Official and Unofficial Releases? (Example: Bee 52 is an Unlicenced cartridge, so this goes under Unofficial) --Hamtaro126 (talk) 14:38, 11 November 2014 (MST)

I might consider it once there is more than one unlicensed game in the list. Having more than one unlicensed game in the list may help toward an explanation of how unlicensed games on the whole use it more, less, or in a different manner compared to licensed games. But having only one doesn't accomplish much other than shaming Codemasters for not having the Seal. --Tepples (talk) 15:19, 12 November 2014 (MST)